Never in my lifetime in New York City had I experienced such crowd-crushing terror. I recently fled the Louvre with my heart pounding. Then museums might not have to limit the number of visitors. Instead, museums should install an outdoor covered terrace with a rotating set of good reproductions and beautiful lighting that the Instagram preeners can use for their backgrounds. Is this a museum or a mud-wrestling match?Ĭan we please ban the use of cellphones to take selfies in front of the art? Your glamorous self blocking half of Queen Elizabeth I’s regalia or the entirety of van Gogh’s haunted face is not what we come to a museum to look at. Too often I have had to toil my way through crowds at a museum to get my turn in front of a canvas, only to feel a sharp elbow in my side, or the contact of a boot against my leg. 7), about bottlenecks and surging crowds at the museum, to the detriment of the viewing experience: Re “ The Louvre Limits Visitors by One-Third” (Arts, Jan. so the majority of Americans can get a bit of a tax break. And I haven’t even mentioned the various sweetheart deals (carried interest) that should be eliminated. I also contemplate that my taxes would probably be a bit lower if everyone paid what they legally owe. I don’t like to pay taxes, but when I consider the benefits I sigh and write the check. What those in Washington, and particularly Republicans, fail to understand is that the I.R.S. Why then would they want to gut the equivalent of a company’s accounts receivable department, the Internal Revenue Service? Doesn’t sound like a good business move to me! Republicans for years have argued that the government should be run more like a business, and that business leaders make good elected officials. The writer is a retired certified public accountant. is now determined to reduce the agency’s ability to pursue cheats and to block necessary legislation to change the code.Įric K. Trump may have (undoubtedly?) cheated on his taxes to exaggerate his losses, but the main culprits in the broader sense are not the wealthy taxpayers who follow the rules, but rather the code, which offers them the ammunition to do so.Īnd the G.O.P. The uproar should be directed at Congress, which over the years has stuffed the Internal Revenue Code with scores of nonsensical “exceptions” to avoid taxation. Trump’s paying no income tax is misplaced. I earned my living teaching my wealthy clients how to legally utilize the numerous (and often ridiculous) rules and regulations that benefit the super-wealthy at the expense of the wage-earning Everyman. has set out to undo the last Congress’s effort to resuscitate the underfunded agency tasked with ensuring tax code compliance. How ironic that just a few weeks after the release of Donald Trump’s tax returns, which laid bare how easy it is for a wealthy individual to exploit the loopholes baked into the Internal Revenue Code, the G.O.P.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |